Choosing among disc golf midranges & putters can become surprisingly specific when two discs share the same model and flight ratings. Here, the Axiom Pixel FIRM NEW and Axiom Pixel SOFT BLANK are both putting discs at the same listed price, so the decision is not about paying more for one. It comes down to which title designation and number-and-weight configuration match what you want.
Quick verdict
The Axiom Pixel FIRM NEW is the clearer match for shoppers seeking the FIRM designation and the 12 - 175g configuration. The Axiom Pixel SOFT BLANK is the better fit for shoppers specifically looking for SOFT BLANK wording and the 2 - 173g configuration. Both are new Axiom Pixel putting discs with the same listed speed, glide, turn, and fade ratings, so neither has a confirmed flight-rating advantage here.
Compact comparison
| Detail | Axiom Pixel FIRM NEW | Axiom Pixel SOFT BLANK |
|---|---|---|
| Listed price | $9.95 | $9.95 |
| Model and disc type | Pixel; Putting Disc | Pixel; Putting Disc |
| Flight ratings | Speed 2, Glide 4, Turn 0, Fade 0.5 | Speed 2, Glide 4, Turn 0, Fade 0.5 |
| Number and weight | 12 - 175g | 2 - 173g |
| Title distinction | FIRM NEW | SOFT BLANK |
Where each product wins
- Axiom Pixel FIRM NEW wins the designation match for anyone who wants the title to identify a FIRM disc. Its
12 - 175gnumber-and-weight entry is also distinct from the other configuration. - Axiom Pixel SOFT BLANK wins the designation match for anyone specifically seeking the SOFT BLANK wording. Its
2 - 173gentry gives shoppers a separate configuration to select. - Neither wins on flight ratings: both show Speed 2, Glide 4, Turn 0, and Fade 0.5. Those shared values should not be treated as a difference.
Product notes
Axiom Pixel Simon Line Lizotte FIRM NEW
The Axiom Pixel Simon Line Lizotte FIRM NEW is the straightforward pick when FIRM is the key requirement. It is identified as a new Axiom Pixel putting disc, and its number-and-weight line reads 12 - 175g, giving a concrete configuration to distinguish it from the SOFT BLANK entry. The same model and shared flight-rating set make it a direct comparison rather than a different mold choice. Its limitation is equally specific: the title does not carry the SOFT BLANK designation, so it is not the naming match for someone seeking that wording. Because the two entries share the same listed price, the reason to choose this version is the FIRM designation and its particular number-and-weight line, not a lower cost.
Axiom Pixel Simon Line Lizotte SOFT BLANK
The Axiom Pixel Simon Line Lizotte SOFT BLANK suits a shopper whose priority is the SOFT BLANK designation. It uses the Pixel model and is identified as a new putting disc, while the number-and-weight line is 2 - 173g. That gives it a clear selection identity beside the FIRM NEW configuration without requiring a claim about which numeric combination performs better. The trade-off is that its title does not identify it as FIRM, so shoppers focused on that exact designation should choose the other entry instead. With the same shared flight ratings and price as the FIRM NEW version, the SOFT BLANK wording and its distinct number-and-weight entry are the concrete reasons to select it.
Final choice by use case
Choose Axiom Pixel FIRM NEW if the FIRM designation and 12 - 175g configuration are the deciding points. Choose Axiom Pixel SOFT BLANK if the SOFT BLANK designation and 2 - 173g configuration are what you want. For a shopper comparing only the flight ratings or listed price, there is no separation: the two Axiom Pixel putting discs match on both. The final decision is therefore a configuration and designation choice, not a proven difference in flight.
